The American refusal to surrender let the Japanese keep their emperor. Japan was ready to surrender because of so many side attacks. No, there were many reasons not to use the bombs.They would go on to mount a death toll of 420,000. The United States entered the war fighting on both the Atlantic and the Pacific fronts. They would go on to mount a death toll of 450,900. The United Kingdom had lost hundreds of thousands, and would also be helping with the war in the pacific. They would go on to mount a death toll of somewhere between 21,800,000 and 28,000,000. The Soviets had already lost millions of lives during the European theatre alone, and they were leading the charge on pushing the Japanese out of China. None of the allied parties wanted the bloodshed to continue. This, ironically, made the United Kingdom the only major superpower with good and honest intentions.ДЄnother key point to remember is the fact of how limited options were. Stalin, however, said nothing about these issues. Also, during these conferences, U.S.S.R representative and leader Joseph Stalin had plans of his own for development of such weapons, and was possibly aware of the United StatesвЂ™ development plans as well. such as Truman, dropped subtle hints at the development of a weapon such as the atomic bomb. During conferences held by the allies, representatives of the U.S. The United States had been developing an atomic weapon since before the fall of European theatre. Who can say for certain that the Soviets would have stopped after just two strikes? Another thing to think about is, where would they have used those weapons? Would they have deployed them on centers of strategic military development like we did, or would they have used them on cities of high political importance, such as Tokyo, killing not thousands, but hundreds of thousands, possibly millions? The fact of this matter is that there was a major lack of communication between the allied parties. Would have been the first to use such weapons of annihilation. first, another country such as the U.S.S.R. The first of which is, the fact that without the bombs having been used by the U.S. It is difficult to say with certainty which, if either, was the right choice. On the other, a countless number of both American, and Japanese lives saved. On one hand, there is the fact of thousands of civilian lives lost, and the destruction of two cities. The issue of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has received much controversy over the years.

Pro atomic bomb arguments